1,687 total views,  4 views today

Current status of gced implementation in southeast asia

The following status of Global Citizenship Education implementation in some of Southeast Asian countries were taken from the report of the representatives of SEAMEO Member Countries that were invited to discuss their GCED implementations and action plans to hasten the realization of SDG Target 4.7 aligning with SEAMEO Priority Areas. The status were shared during the Virtual Consultation Meeting on Global Citizenship Education hosted by SEAMEO Secretariat and APCEIU that conducted on 21 of August 2021.

Ms. Hajah Rosinah binti Haji Sabli from MoE Brunei Darussalam and Ms.Hajah Siti Aminah binti Haji Jumaat from the Brunei Darussalam Leadership and Teacher Academy shared about their country’s GCED implementation progress since the “Subregional Workshop on GCED in Southeast Asia” co-organized by APCEIU and SEAMEO back in 2019.

Ms. Jumaat said the country’s existing social studies curriculum has three domains—pure history (30%), pure geography (30%), and other social aspects (40%). Following the 2019 workshop, both speakers shared that they proposed that the government change its social studies curriculum to include GCED and change the proportions to pure history (40%), pure geography (40%), and GCED (20%).

Ms. Jumaat said the country’s existing social studies curriculum has three domains—pure history (30%), pure geography (30%), and other social aspects (40%). Following the 2019 workshop, both speakers shared that they proposed that the government change its social studies curriculum to include GCED and change the proportions to pure history (40%), pure geography (40%), and GCED (20%).

Moreover, in 2019, Brunei Darussalam analyzed the status of its social studies curriculum for Years 7 and 8. Ms. Jumaat added that social studies is only taught in Years 7 and 8. Students in Years 9 and 10 can choose to take geography or history.

Moreover, in 2019, Brunei Darussalam analyzed the status of its social studies curriculum for Years 7 and 8. Ms. Jumaat added that social studies is only taught in Years 7 and 8. Students in Years 9 and 10 can choose to take geography or history.

This year, Brunei Darussalam plans to integrate GCED as a sub theme in its social studies curriculum for Years 7 and 8 in one pilot school. At present, the committee in charge of the integration completed 70% of the syllabus. It plans to publish a complementary book to assist teachers in implementing the new social studies curriculum.

CHALLENGES
  • Lack of GCED experts, especially in the field of building the capacity of teachers and school leaders.
  • Limited resources for GCED training.
OPPORTUNITIES
  • Enroll in online GCED courses provided by APCEIU and SEAMEO
  • Contact APCEIU to obtain more resources to train school leaders, teachers, and students
  • Collaborate with other countries related to GCED activities and actions
ACTION PLANS AND POTENTIAL COLLABORATORS
actionplan-brunei

Dr. Mok Sarom said Cambodia has been working with SEAMEO since 2016 to integrate GCED into its national curriculum. The country reformed its national curriculum by injecting elements of GCED, particularly in history and moral civics for Grades 1–12 students. At present, Cambodia is also participating in APCEIU’s International Teacher Exchange Project to promote awareness of the importance and understanding of GCED among its teachers.

CHALLENGES
  • Lack of understanding of GCED among teachers
  • Insufficient GCED-related teacher training
  • Reduced GCED learning due to school disruptions
OPPORTUNITIES
  • Cambodia is a pluralistic society so the rationale behind GCED matches the country’s morals
ACTION PLANS AND POTENTIAL COLLABORATORS
actionplan-cambodia

Ms. Farah Arriani from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology (MoECRT) began by sharing a background of education in Indonesia. Indonesia believes that education has an important role in influencing social change. Despite the country’s diversity in terms of ethnicity and culture, it strives to ensure unity through the Pancasila—the five philosophies of national life—and ensuring the availability of a curriculum that suits its citizens’ needs.

GCED is recognized as an important element in preparing students to become active contributors to a more peaceful, tolerant, inclusive, and secure world. As such, it is being integrated into the Indonesian curriculum as far back as 1947, as part of character education and state and community awareness.

Ms. Arriani continued by saying that the values and morals espoused in the Pancasila, which coincide with GCED, have been included in the country’s curriculum. As such, it develops in students the attitudes, knowledge, and skills that place the Indonesian culture at the heart of education. In particular, the curriculum aims to make all Indonesians:

  • Religious and respectful of other religions
  • Love their nation, homeland, and country
  • Concerned about developing just national, social, and economic lives
  • Ensure democracy that respects social and cultural pluralism
  • Contributors to realizing dignified and respected human lives
  • Contributors to building a socially just society

The values and morals in the Pancasila are not taught exclusively through various subjects. Instead, the government is using a whole-school approach that teaches them throughout the learning ecosystem and through cultural, co-curricular, and extra-curricular activities. It also elicits the help of families and the entire society.

GCED is being integrated into school subjects, such as Pancasila education and citizenship and religion. It is also integrated into educational content to equip students not just with the knowledge but also skills and attitudes they need to recognize and love the natural, social, cultural, and spiritual areas of their environment and understand the nation’s diversity. GCED is also integrated into extra-curricular activities, such as scouting, hiking, and collaborative social projects.

GCED is also connected to national character building, as the nation’s education policy highlights diversity. As such, students need to develop 18 values—tolerance, social care, caring for the environment, responsibility, and peace. They need to become good-minded, good-hearted, and well-behaved individuals.

Ms. Arriani continued by presenting Indonesia’s education vision—to realize a developed Indonesia that is sovereign, independent, and has personality through the creation of Pancasila-trained students. To do that, Pancasila education is taught from early childhood to secondary level, even in special schools. The subject aims to teach children to:

  • Have faith, fear of God, and nobility
  • Become independent
  • Be capable of critical reasoning
  • Have respect for global diversity
  • Be collaborative
  • Be creative

To ensure that the students understand what they are taught, context is applied to all content and experience-based learning is used. In particular, their learning focuses on five themes that are related to the SDGs and the Pancasila—diversity, climate change, bullying, entrepreneurship, and technology and engineering. Lessons are extended to intra- and extra-curricular activities and the school culture. When they graduate, they will be equipped with 21st-century skills and understand various culture and values and respect differences among people.

CHALLENGES
  • Current GCED policies are not implemented throughout the country since it does not have a specifc national policy for promoting GCED
  • Limited educator access to GCED-related information
OPPORTUNITIES
  • GCED has been part of the curriculum for a long time now, taught as part of character education and other subjects
  • GCED could be integrated into all subjects
ACTION PLAN AND POTENTIAL COLLABORATORS
actionplan-indonesia

Dr. Silinthone Sacklokham from the Ministry of Education and Sports (MoES) of Lao PDR shared that since 2019, the country has been implementing GCED capacity-building programs, disseminating related information, and participating in connected meetings and conferences. The country has started implementing GCED capacity-building programs at the national and international levels.

On the national level, it has been working with UNESCO Bangkok to organize a national dissemination and consultation workshop on GCED for educational planners, curriculum developers, and educators. It has also organized workshops for primary and secondary schoolteachers in Huaphan, Bolikhamxay, and Vientiane between 2019 and 2020 and trainings in 33 UNESCO Associated Schools Network (ASPnet) member schools.
The country also actively participated in various international programs, including the “Asia-Pacific Training Workshop on EIU,” the “Global Capacity-Building Workshop on GCED,” the “UNESCO-Korea Joint Fellowship Program,” and the “Youth Leadership Workshop on GCED.” In addition, it participated in the 2020 Korea-Lao PDR Teacher Exchange Program. Some of these were organized by APCEIU.
To facilitate GCED implementation in the education sector, decision makers, educators, teachers, and researchers were given greater access to GCED-related information. The Lao National Commission for UNESCO launched programs through various online platforms, including Facebook and WhatsApp. Some Lao educators also participated in GCED-centric conferences and meetings, such as the “UNESCO 2019 Forum on ESD and Global Citizenship,” the “Sharing Stories about Asia-Pacific Education Movements (SSAEM) Conference,” and the “International Conference on GCED” organized by APCEIU.
Since 2019, by collaborating with UNESCO and APCEIU, the Lao education sector has been implementing various GCED projects, including the New ASPnet Project, Teacher Training and Support for GCED 2019–2020, and the Luangprabang Teacher Training College. The country has also been developing GCED source packs for teachers and is currently implementing GCED curriculum development and integration, which is set to last from 2021 to 2023. 
CHALLENGES
  • Limited understanding of GCED among curriculum developers, teachers, and educators
  • Limited skills, especially to understand foreign languages, to access resources and insufcient number of available teaching and learning materials
  • Professional development training for in-service teachers are not continuously provided
OPPORTUNITIES
  • Create GCED assessment tools based on the UNESCO publication, “GCED: Topics and Learning Objectives,” for piloting in some schools
  • Publish more research papers on GCED topics and translate existing publications into Lao
  • Prepare legal documents to implement SDG Target 4.7 and GCED by integrating it into policies and the education system
ACTION PLAN AND POTENTIAL COLLABORATORS
actionplan-lao

Ms. Noor Hayati binti Uteh from MoE Malaysia began by reiterating the importance of transformative GCED. To ensure that it is, we need to ensure that teaching and learning provide students opportunities to participate actively in addressing and making connections among global and national issues, such as social, political, economic, or environmental challenges. Another critical issue is integrating core GCED conceptual frameworks and dimensions (i.e., cognitive, socio-emotional, and behavioral) into general education.

The Malaysian education blueprint contains GCED elements, particularly in Shift 3, where the government acknowledges the importance of balancing global citizenship development with maintaining a strong national identity. The blueprint aims to ensure that students leave school as global citizens imbued with core universal values and a strong Malaysian identity.
Aside from integrating GCED into the country’s curriculum, MoE wants teachers to be well-prepared to teach GCED. One of its most important projects, Embedding GCED into the Curriculum through Project-Based Learning (PBL) has two phases.
Phase 1 aims to: 

  • Align the lower secondary curriculum in math, science, history, and geography with the SDGs and create GCED project-based lessons
  • Develop lesson plans and teaching materials for the identified projects
  • Test the lessons developed among students in a classroom environment and gather feedback from them, teachers, and MoE curriculum officers on how effective they are
  • Train teachers from selected pilot schools to run the project in their respective subjects

The phase is expected to produce these results:

  • A total of 20 lessons for Form 1 that are aligned with more than 10 SDGs
  • Mock lessons to evaluate the project conducted in two pilot schools among 186 students; 90% of the students should become interested in learning more about global issues afterward
  • Centralized training for teachers from four pilot schools on implementing GCED PBL in classrooms

Ms. Uteh continued by showing how SDG 3 and GCED objectives have been integrated into the country’s geography syllabus for Grade 7. That should encourage students to learn more about tracing COVID-19 cases across Malaysia.

Phase 2 of the project aims to:

  • Run the monitoring and evaluation processes for all students involved in the pilot to gather data on the effectiveness of PBL in developing responsible global citizens
  • Provide customized in-school support and assistance to schoolteachers so they can plan for and implement their PBL teaching strategies in the classroom
  • Develop a professional learning community (PLC) that encourages collaboration among teachers to develop GCED PBL lessons aided by continuous professional development

To design the project, MoE used UNESCO Bangkok’s PBL design called “CREATE,” which espouses the following:

  • Mapping out a curriculum-based and contextualized theme
  • Choosing real-world issues to ensure that topics are authentic and relevant to the Students
  • Using expert thinking to improve students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) to investigate and solve problems and make sure they are open-ended (i.e., there are no wrong or right solutions)
  • Ensuring that learning results are achievable and measurable
  • Fostering teamwork
  • Ensuring that learning times, space, and impact extend beyond classroom 
  • boundaries

Ms. Uteh said that PBL is usually conducted at the end of a process. In MoE’s case, however, PBL was started from the beginning.

Before concluding her presentation, she introduced the Digital Education Learning Initiative Malaysia (DELIMa) Platform all teachers can use. It was the product of a project funded by the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) in Malaysia. This platform gives teachers and students information about PBL use in the classroom. It guides teachers on employing the strategy while aligning lessons with the SDGs and GCED-related objectives. She said that COVID-19 increased the demand for sophisticated learning tools, such as DELIMa. Challenges remain, however, such as how to connect the dots between what students learn in class and the actual issues they face in real life. As such, she believes teachers need more support.

Dr. Margarita Consolacion Ballesteros represented the Department of Education (DepEd) of the Philippines to present the current status of GCED implementation in the country. She said that the Philippines became a member of the Group of Friends for Solidarity and Inclusion with GCED on 26 May 2021.

The group started of with 11 member countries—Armenia, Austria, Bangladesh, Colombia, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Senegal, and Serbia. In a joint statement, they reaffirmed that closer global cooperation is crucial to eradicating COVID-19.

The Philippines also took part in the GCED Curriculum Development and Integration Project. On 2 June 2020, the Philippine Normal University (PNU), which is considered the country’s National Center for Teacher Education, was designated by the DepEd as the project’s implementing partner. PNU has been working closely with APCEIU and DepEd for the second and third phases of the project, which aims to strengthen the full integration of GCED into DepEd’s curriculum standards.

In November 2020, the second phase of the GCED Curriculum Development and Integration Project was successfully completed by PNU. It had four objectives, namely:

  • Develop a list of Philippine GCED indicators
  • Map Philippine GCED indicators to the contents of the basic education curriculum
  • Develop the Philippine GCED Framework
  • Elaborate how the GCED Framework can be integrated into the K–12 curricula by identifying the knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to the concept

These objectives produced relevant documents and outputs that were implemented in phase 3. This phase is still ongoing and has four objectives and six expected outputs shown in the following table.

phil-table

Dr. Ballesteros explained that the Philippines also takes part in the Korea-Philippines Teacher Exchange Programme (KPTEP) organized by APCEIU. The Philippines and APCEIU started KPTEP back in 2012. It aims to provide Korean and Filipino teachers constructive experiences to:

  • Learn from each other’s education system
  • Deepen their cultural understanding
  • Build inter-cultural communicative competency in teaching while collaborating with local teachers
  • Strengthen the existing education network between the two countries 

 This program also contributes to the fulfillment of SDG Targets 4.7 and 4.c, which urge the global community to promote global citizenship through education and invest in enhancing teacher quality through international cooperation to strengthen their global competency. From 2012 to 2021, more than 300 teachers from South Korea and the Philippines have taken part in KPTEP. And since 2019, the Philippines has been ensuring that the Filipino teachers who take part in KPTEP come from the country’s various regions. Unfortunately, due to COVID-19, KPTEP was conducted online this year.

CHALLENGES
  • Constantly changing educational priorities from one administration to the next
  • Old and irrelevant curricula and learning materials that do not integrate GCED
  • Lack of teachers trained in GCED
  • Weak leadership in terms of promoting global citizenship
OPPORTUNITIES
  • GCED on the Move: Regional Roadshows, which comprise writing workshops involving teachers who are part of KPTEP
  • Collaborative research on integrating GCED into Southeast Asian curricula
  • GCED leadership programs
  • Policy forum involving Southeast Asian MoEs and Philippine local government units (LGUs)
ACTION PLAN AND POTENTIAL COLLABORATORS
  • GCED on the Move: Regional Roadshows, conduct of workshops, writerships with teachers from the APTE program
  • Collaborative Research on GCED in the Curriculum within ASEAN
  • GCED Leadership Programs for SEA
  • Policy Forum: MOE to MOE, MOE to LGUs
Ms. Amy Sim, Lead Specialist for Social Studies for Primary Students, and Ms. Ng May Gay, Lead Specialist for Character and Citizenship Education (CCE), from MoE Singapore said that since 2019, the country has been implementing two new syllabi—one for humanities and another for CCE. Social studies is a compulsory subject for Primary Grade 1 to Secondary Grade 5 students. It is a 10-year curriculum since it plays an important role in developing in citizens civic literacy, global awareness, and cross-cultural understanding.

The country’s social studies curriculum promotes global citizenship. As the students get older, they learn more about the concept. The curriculum aims to help students become informed, concerned, and participative citizens.

Singapore utilizes the humanities inquiry approach to implement the curriculum and promote GCED. To ensure its effectiveness, it is important to sustain a culture of inquiry in classrooms. The key features of the Social Studies Primary (SSP) 2020Curriculum, which enhances the development of global citizenship competencies, are:

  • Instructional materials that emphasize strong foundational humanities knowledge and skills
  • Learning experiences that help students develop citizenship competencies
  • Learning experiences that nurture students’ understanding of Southeast Asia and the world
  • Stories and digital and tactile resources that enhance student learning
  • Professional development for teachers so they can teach global citizenship competencies

Ms. Sim continued by saying that instructional materials provide students with strong foundational knowledge and skills in humanities. They let students acquire content knowledge and disciplinary skills, such as historical and geographical inquiry, critical thinking, perspective taking, information, and digital literacy skills. Ms. Sim also introduced SURE, an online platform jointly developed by MoE and the National Library Board ,to teach students to determine there liability of digital sources. MoE also prepared a step-by-step guide for teachers to imbue students with inquiry and critical thinking skills.

SSP 2020 Curriculum also utilizes learning experiences to develop students’ citizenship competencies. Teachers facilitate class discussions on authentic, contemporary issues that concern the society. The topics are not limited to local issues but also those in Southeast Asia. For that, MoE developed various digital resources in animated form to help students understand various social aspects of the region, including festivals. The learning experiences featured in the curriculum aims to nurture in students an understanding of Southeast Asia and the rest of the world. They acquire knowledge about the region and discuss Singapore’s connection with it and the world via social studies lessons. Stories and digital and tactile resources are used to enhance learning experiences. Modal resources are also used to engage students in learning. An example would be using a story and a digital resource to help them learn about environmental conservation.

Ms. Ng continued the presentation by sharing more information about CCE. The course aims to prepare students to adapt and keep up with the evolving world. It has three guiding principles, namely:

  • Student-centricity: Rationalize student development efforts to achieve the CCE goals.
  • Coherence:  Transform students’ experiences across their journey from primary to
  • secondary school.
  • Intentionality: Establish clarity of purpose and greater intentionality across  student development efforts. 

Ultimately, CCE aims to develop students who demonstrate good character, resilience, socio-emotional well-being, active citizenship, and future readiness. The  CCE Curriculum Framework  comprises core values (i.e., socio-emotional competencies and citizenship disposition) that focus on developing a sense of purpose.

Values shape the beliefs, attitudes, and actions of a person. Therefore, they became the core of the  CCE Curriculum Framework.  In addition, the framework also emphasizes that an individual will live up to the core values that become the foundation of his/her character and meaningfully apply the socio-emotional competencies that he/she has learned. When students apply these competencies, they will live up to their values and grow their character.

The  CCE Curriculum Framework  also espouses three big ideas (i.e., identity, relationships, and choices). Its fundamentals, meanwhile, are woven into six learning areas (i.e., national education, sexual education, mental health education, career guidance, cyber wellness, and family education). In practice, CCE is imparted in various ways, such as through in-class CCE lessons, key student development experiences, school-based initiatives, other subjects and personal applications. The government also tries to ensure an accommodating school environment to support CCE. Emphasis is placed on peer support and relationships, positive teacher-student relationships, student voice and ownership, consistent and coherent messaging, and adult role modeling.

Ms. Ng also explained what cohort learning journeys are, which provide primary and secondary students with developmentally appropriate opportunities to explore their Singaporean identity through appreciating their heritage, culture, and arts. These, therefore, complement the country’s art, CCE, history, and social studies curricula.

CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
  • Harnessing teachers’ passion and strengthening their capacity
  • Strengthening research collaboration and synergizing related eforts
ACTION PLAN AND POTENTIAL COLLABORATORS
actionplan-singapore

Dr. Chanita Rukspollmuang from Siam University and Dr. Athapol Anunthavorasakul from Chulalongkorn University presented for Thailand.

SIAM UNIVERSITY

Dr. Rukspollmuang said that back in 2019, the country revised the 1999 National Education Policy known as “Thai 4.0” to include GCED as an element. But while the draft of the Revised National Education Act has been completed, it has yet to be implemented. In 2019, the basic education curriculum was also revised to include three desirable objectives of education (DOEs)—to turn students into lifelong learners, innovative co-creators, and active citizens.

Most recently, Thailand began implementing the  National Education Reform Plan, whichwasrevisedin2020.Itincludestheso-called“5BigRocks.”Ithasthesamethree DOEs and aims to develop the Thailand Lifelong Learning Index (TLLI). The country alsodraftedacompetency-basedcurriculum.Finally,theMinistryofHigherEducation, Science, Research and Innovation (MHESI) is implementing the three DOEs in HEIs and undergoing various reforms, particularly with regard to university programs.

Dr. Rukspollmuang then explained the competency-based curriculum for basic education. She said it hopes to develop five key competencies in students, namely:

  • Self-management
  • Communication
  • Teamwork and collaboration
  • Higher-order thinking
  • Active citizenship

To turn students into active citizens, they are taught to respect others’ rights, be responsiblecitizens,participateincivicmatterswhilereservingjudgment,andbecome agents of change for a better society.

MoE plans to implement the competency-based curriculum frst in selected elementary schools by 2022, selected secondary schools and all elementary schools by 2023, and all basic education institutions by 2024. Since 2019, Siam University has been striving to revise its General Education Program to nurture desirable characteristics among students. For now, it has revised the Triangle of Living Lab and UPC4LocalSDG: Applied Living Lab Programs, which aim to create a learning community that promotes the SDGs and GCED.

CHALLENGES
  • COVID-19 has proven to be a major disruptor to Industry 4.0 and the 21st century
  • Competency-based curriculum implementation plan was postponed in 2021
  • Office of Education Council (OEC) follow-up study of the implementation of DOEs in basic education institutions was delayed
OPPORTUNITIES
  • Office of the Teacher Civil Service and Educational Personnel Commission (OTEPC) will implement the newly proposed Teacher Professional Promotion Performance Appraisal (with emphasis on student outcomes) in 2021
  • DOEs, GCED, or even the SDGs may need to be reviewed due to the pandemic
  • Projects to develop innovative co-creators were started by OEC
  • TLLI revision and implementation based on 2021 national average score of 0.32:

  • Dimension 1: Lifelong learning ecosystem = 0.52
  • Dimension 2: Lifelong learners = 0.47
  • Dimension 3: Education outcomes = 0.21 

ACTION PLAN AND POTENTIAL COLLABORATORS
actionplan-siam

CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY

Dr. Anunthavorasakul continued the presentation by sharing about the progress of GCED implementation in Chulalongkorn University. Since 2019, GCED has been integrated into the preservice teacher preparation program. Next year, the university plans to make the course part of the general education program although it will focus more on GCED competencies and elements.

Chulalongkorn University has also been actively promoting GCED teacher development inschoolsthroughprojects,schoolnetworks,andcollaborationswithvariouspartners. It developed learning activities and exhibits based on its shared histories module with museums in the country. It also took part in the joint project of International Information and Networking Centre for Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Asia-Pacific Region (ICHCAP), APCEIU, and UNESCO, which aims to integrate intangible cultural heritage and GCED into primary and secondary education. Finally, the university has also been preparing GCED materials targeting teachers and policymakers.

CHALLENGES
  • COVID-19-induced school disruption and emergency remote teaching amid lockdowns
  • Political conficts, reduced democracy, and negotiations with the Conservatives
OPPORTUNITIES
  • Drafting a new core curriculum
  • ESD center selection to serve as GCED cooperation center by APCEIU
  • Integration with other projects, such as ICH and ASPnet
  • High Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) results for global competencies in 2018
ACTION PLAN AND POTENTIAL COLLABORATORS
actionplan-chulalongkorn
Prof. Le Anh Vinh from the Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences (VNIES) began by sharing Vietnam’s progress in GCED implementation. He mentioned the new curriculum that was implemented in Academic Year (AY) 2020–2021 among Grade 1 students initially. This curriculum departed from knowledge-based elements to focus more on developing the students’ qualities and competencies, particularly in terms of global citizenship.

The Ministry of Education and Training (MoET) issued policy documents and guidelines to implement GCED-related tasks in AY 2020–2021, including creating GCED content, encouraging the study of foreign languages, strengthening exchanges and cooperation to promote the understanding of national and international cultural values, and fostering international cooperation (e.g., student exchanges, etc.). The ministry also promulgated a new circular that renews learning assessment to promote comprehensive education, develop students’ qualities and capabilities, and facilitate the implementation of GCED.

To transform education, GCED concepts like education on children’s rights and obligations, gender equality, environmental protection, efficient and economical energy consumption, climate change response, and natural disaster prevention and mitigation should be taught in school. Many teachers have been proactively and creatively implementing GCED. They have benefited from the cooperation of schools, families, and communities as well.

VNIES is also in charge of the national GCED project. It conducted a survey to assess how GCED is being taught in school. The survey found discrepancies in various parts of the country. In some areas, teachers proactively taught GCED, while in others, teachers still had limited knowledge and capacity to do so. The institute is currently trying to identify difficulties teachers are facing on the ground and coming up with possible solutions to address the issues.

CHALLENGES
  • GCED is a new concept so there is no single approach to its implementation
  • Limited knowledge of GCED among teachers and lack of good training materials for educators
  • GCED monitoring and evaluation remain limited
  • Insufficient facilities for GCED implementation
  • COVID-19 and related school closures
OPPORTUNITIES
  • Promotion of integration and active contribution to GCED regionally and globally has become the basis of enhancing GCED
  • Global challenges like COVID-19 highlighted the value of interconnection and interdependence among countries and regions, along with the need for unity, responsibility, kindness, sharing, and international cooperation, which made it possible to select appropriate situations and contents for GCED efectively
  • Improved information technology (IT) infrastructure and capability of schools to facilitate access, connection, exchange, and cooperation with others in the region and around the world
  • Deployment of the new general education curriculum, which espouses GCED, that aims to develop the qualities and competencies of students will continue
ACTION PLAN AND POTENTIAL COLLABORATORS
actionplan-vietnam

 1,688 total views,  5 views today